"Art for art's sake" ..yeah that's what we studies in the history of literature, as how have the works of literature- the novels, poetry, dramas- as so far their authors ..who are governed and imitate the principle or what overwhelms them as logic or idea true!--: are oh "art for art's sake" and "art for morality sake" (well well, that there is a pedagogical element too, that must be given rule over our impetus nerves). Now that in our lecture of Jan 5, 2015 we were conveyed that there are two approaches as for the taste of laureates of literature (the authors) .. "art for art's sake" and "art for life's sake". Then ooh! where goes the monument of "art for moral sake" that we studied in our preceding chapters-- ??
Oh am i calling for rote-learning. Oh no no- Just that the juxtapose of two ideas are making my comprehension go dead! :P
P.S
We are studying Victorian Period.
Oh am i calling for rote-learning. Oh no no- Just that the juxtapose of two ideas are making my comprehension go dead! :P
P.S
We are studying Victorian Period.
No comments:
Post a Comment